
**** Potential Spoilers - Read with Caution! *****
I'm astounded that the brunt of the reviews i've read for SPEED RACER all pretty much complain about the over-saturated world and the nauseating camera work. What about the story? The characters perhaps? Anybody care about that?
It seems to me that what most people care about (including so called movie reviewers) are visuals. To them this tells the whole story. Never mind the swiss-cheese plots, weak dialogue and stupid characters. At the center of any movie should be a story that resonates with the audience. Call it heart or a spine, but this is what makes you believe in what you are seeing regardless of whether it is fantastic or improbable. Remember that you've already made a gigantic leap of faith by being in a darkened room with a bunch of strangers, watching pure make-believe.
I'll preface everything by saying that I really enjoyed Speed Racer. The Wachowski Brothers deserve credit for creating such a unique and memorable world and yes it is filled with color and lots of it. In one scene inside the Racer home, the color of the walls harmoniously complement the color of each characters' outfits as the camera cut to them. For those who think "how hard could that be? Just throw a bunch of colors together!" It takes a lot of planning and a lot of thought to make palettes work together and I know from experience that they spent a good amount of time making sure your eyes engaged the right part of the screen.
What I really liked about this movie is the story. I loved that despite all the fast-paced racing scenes and cartoony quips is a simple story centered around a family. You may ask what is original about this? Absolutely nothing. But the Wachowski's set out to make a movie about a family for families to enjoy. The knew they where not making The Matrix here and I applaud them for staying true to their vision. The family dynamic is a universal theme and thus, stories about them will keep re-appearing in movies forever.
And speaking of staying true, I really loved the fact that the movie doesn't stray from being what it really is: A Cartoon. At no point does it try and cross into our side of reality to get some validation. It is a self-contained world with it's own rules and it's own physics.
The plot is simple. Speed Racer must make a monumental choice. One essentially sells his soul to the devil but sets his family up for life while the other would kill his career and put a giant bullseye on his back. (like the one I recently acquired by saying Iron Man had a weak plot) At the same time, the naive Speed is eternally haunted by the death of his older brother who like him was an accomplished racer but lost his life by making seemingly bad judgements. (figuratively and literally) Could he end up like him? Speed has a good relationship with his family whose life has been spent operating their own independent racing team. But another choice he must make is whether to stick to tradition or to sell out. Yet another one of those universal conundrums that appear in films time and again.
I guess the point I am trying to make is that it is easy to watch a movie and say that "it's the same, tired story i've seen so many times. Why couldn't they have come up with something else?" Well it's all in the telling my friends. A great storyteller will take the mundane and make it a masterpiece. A weak one will take a great story and make it underwhelming.
The Wachowski's have never been known to write convincing dialogue and they certainly didn't do it here in Speed Racer. They aren't the best at being concise with their narrative either and here they could have certainly trimmed 20 minutes from the movie. Then there's the blinding and disorienting racing footage that people are complaining about. These are the same people that didn't have a problem watching the Bourne movies as well as that largely incoherent mess called Cloverfield. Oh and there's Transformers as well. There's some logic issues in the film as well but nothing so large as to disengage you from watching. (Like why they really needed a new car for the final race when they already had one that seems to work fine)
What they did do is keep things simple story-wise. Wrapped in the intricate corporate intrigue is a family trying to deal with adversity. (while having fun in the process) The Wachowski's even managed a little taste of the bittersweet in the end. Something for you to ponder while your eyes adjusted back to seeing the real world.

6 comments:
You are spitting some straight up truth homeslice!!! I was pretty terrified that this movie was gonna be awful. I foolishly checked what Rotten Tomatoes had to say before headin' over to the theater. Fortunately, me and my friend Katy had been planning on checking this one out for weeks.
I guess sometimes film critics are more concerned about a film's context or message and sometimes just miss out on a really fun time. Too bad for them. A good lesson in seeing for myself.
Matt,
Like you I checked out what everyone was saying including reviews from Rotten Tomatoes before I saw the movie and thought they where dubious. I went back and checked those same reviews after I saw SR and laughed at them.
Those who complain about the visuals basically don't get that the world in SR is that of a cartoon. Those who accept it end up having a great time.
SR is not only fun visually but there is a simple yet, meaningful ode to family in it's core which makes it a complete experience. Personally I can't wait to watch it again.
I do have this distinct feeling we are in the minority....
Thank you Louie for taking the time to write about the Speed Racer movie. I wasn't sure if this was a film to wait for on DVD? No one I know has seen the movie yet - so I couldn't decide to wait or watch....I did take the temptation of playing the first 7 minutes on yahoo's site and was already entertained by the numerous tricky and creative transitions. The story flashbacks were already intriguing.
I do remember the test shot done while I was working at the Orphanage. And when I saw the official Speed Racer trailer, the Wachowski Brothers really took it over the top with the style and everything.
While the critics were waiting to see if Iron-man would stay #1 during the Speed Racer opening, I really hopedthis film to have a great story. So since you gave it a big thumbs up, I'll definitely check it out this week.
Cheers!
Gerald,
The movie is not doing well in the box office basically due to the success of Iron Man and the critic-dependent public panning it from reading the negative reviews.
Using the story filter on any movie is the only litmus test I depend on. As much as SR isn't the the greatest movie, it has so many things working for it including the cool visuals and the dynamic camera work. But most of all it has a good, viable story.
I hope it does well in video.
I was with you till you bashed Cloverfield.
I like the Wachowskis, even though they have their faults, and I will always give them the benefit of the doubt. They seem good at taking basic cookie cutter storylines and making them just a bit twisted and subversive.
Dustin,
I agree with regarding the Wachowskis and their modifications on familiar themes. At least they try and present something fresh.
As for Cloverfield, It did everything right except tell a compelling story. Personally I didn't quite connect with a bunch of whiny yuppies trying to escape a huge monster. I could have cared less if they where squashed or not. That's my big issue.
But if you look at that movie in the context of FUN, as in IRON MAN was FUN, TRANSFORMERS was FUN, Cloverfield gets 5 stars. It was just emotionally deficient.
But that's just me. There really no wrong or right here.
Post a Comment